The Rulebook
No moderators. Juries.
Nobody on this platform has the power to remove what a citizen says: not founders, not admins, nobody. Content comes down only when a randomly drawn panel of citizens votes to remove it under a rule written on this page. The rules themselves can be challenged through the Blueprint, like any other policy.
How it works
- An automated filter screens every submission for the clearest violations only. Anything it flags is hidden, not deleted, and goes straight to a jury.
- Any citizen can report content against a specific rule. Five reports from five different citizens hide it pending review. It never vanishes silently.
- A panel of citizens is drawn at random: never the submitter, never a reporter, never anyone who has served three times in the past month. Jurors see the content and the rule, not the author. Majority decides: keep, remove, or escalate to a fresh panel.
- Panels dissolve the moment a case is decided. Only the vote tally is kept, never who voted which way. There is no moderation team to join, anywhere in the system.
- One appeal per removal, decided by a completely fresh panel. No single person can override a jury, in either direction.
Disagree with a rule?
The rulebook is a Tier Two document. Propose a change on the Blueprint, argue your case, and if it crosses its threshold the rulebook gets a new version, the same process as changing tax policy.
Propose a change